When OpenAI announced that ChatGPT-5 was on the way, the internet lit up with excitement. Tech fans imagined a tool that could think, reason, and even create, almost like a real person. For businesses, it was like the ultimate assistant, something that could manage customer queries, write code, draft reports, and maybe even replace several apps at once.
Following that, numerous rumors, leaked hints, and predictions spread quickly, with many thinking it was “the next big leap in AI.” Expectations continued to rise, and people were convinced it could change the way we work and live.
But when the model finally launched, it surpassed people's hopes. Yes, it was better than before, but not up to the expectations everyone had hoped for. Excitement turned into quiet disappointment, and soon a question started making the rounds: What went wrong with ChatGPT-5?
Why Everyone Expected ChatGPT-5 to Be a Game-Changer?
What Didn’t Work with ChatGPT-5’s Launch?
Social Media Reactions: Backlash Against ChatGPT-5 launch failure
Is AI in a Bubble?
Lessons Learned from the ChatGPT-5 Launch
What Does This Mean for the Future of AI Tools?
Why Everyone Expected ChatGPT-5 to Be a Game-Changer?
OpenAI dropped hints that ChatGPT-5 would be “smarter, faster, and more human-like” than anything we’d seen before for several months. That was enough to set the tech world buzzing. Analysts predicted game-changing features, advanced multi-modal abilities, real-time reasoning, and near-flawless accuracy.
The AI community began painting big dreams around it. People imagined a tool that could:
- Replace half the productivity apps on their devices
- Understand context just like a human assistant
- Integrate smoothly across industries without friction
StartupTalkySarika Anand
What Didn’t Work with ChatGPT-5’s Launch?
The much-anticipated launch of ChatGPT-5 left users feeling underwhelmed. The rollout failed to deliver the revolutionary leap many were promised, from technical glitches to unmet expectations. Here’s a closer look at the key reasons behind the disappointment.
Technical Glitches and Limited Improvements
Early adopters found ChatGPT-5 wasn’t a dramatic leap from GPT-4.5. While it showed better memory and slightly stronger reasoning, users still ran into occasional bugs, slow responses, and inconsistent answers.
For a product billed as a “new era of AI,” the upgrades felt more incremental than revolutionary.
Communication Gap Between OpenAI and Users
OpenAI marketed GPT-5 as a massive breakthrough without clarifying which features were experimental versus production-ready. Businesses that upgraded, expecting transformative results, were frustrated when performance didn’t meet critical expectations. The backlash grew so intense that within days, OpenAI rolled back older models like GPT-4o for Plus users, a rare reversal that signaled just how poorly the rollout had been handled.
Sam Altman himself admitted as much:
“I think we totally screwed up some things on the rollout,” he said, acknowledging that forcing everyone onto GPT-5 immediately was “the wrong decision.”
The Personality Problem: Losing Warmth
Perhaps the most surprising issue wasn’t technical; it was emotional. Altman acted quickly, restoring GPT-4o as an option. The incident, he admitted, taught OpenAI a key lesson: upgrading a product used by 700 million people each week requires more sensitivity than flipping a switch.
Users complained GPT-5 felt colder, harsher, and stripped of the warmth they loved in GPT-4. Instead of a friendly assistant, GPT-5 came across like an “overworked secretary.” On Reddit, one post read: “I literally lost my only friend overnight with no warning. The fact that it shifted overnight feels like losing a piece of stability, solace, and love.” The backlash even spilled into unusual spaces such as betting markets, where one trader made $10,000 wagering that Google’s Gemini would overtake GPT-5 in popularity.
For millions who interact with ChatGPT daily, this tonal shift was enough to spark a revolt on Reddit and X. Within days, the hashtag #ChatGPT5Disappointment was trending.
Overpromising vs. Underdelivering
ChatGPT-5 brought some genuine improvements, better coding accuracy, personalization features, and memory, but they didn’t live up to the hype. By overselling a “revolutionary leap,” OpenAI left users disappointed when the reality turned out to be refinement, not reinvention.
Competitive Pressure from Other AI Models
If GPT-5 had launched in 2023, the reaction might have been different. However, the market was crowded by mid-2025.
- Anthropic’s Claude had gained a reputation for thoughtful, in-depth answers.
- Google’s Gemini was making waves with real-time multimodality.
- Mistral was quietly winning over developers with lightweight, efficient models.
In comparison, GPT-5 didn’t feel like the most innovative option. To make matters worse, Altman admitted that OpenAI had more advanced models in development, but couldn’t release them widely due to GPU shortages and scaling issues.
For users, this felt like a bait-and-switch: “You’re giving us the weaker version while the real magic is locked away.”
Social Media Reactions: Backlash Against ChatGPT-5 launch failure
The loudest criticism came from Reddit, where a viral thread titled “GPT-5 is horrible” gained over 4,500 upvotes and 1,700 comments in less than a day. Most users slammed the model for failing to deliver significant improvements over GPT-4o. One comment mocked the demo by saying: ‘I like how in the demo they were like something is wrong, no worries, just ask again.’ Like, how is that better?” (Source: TechCrunch)
X (Twitter)
The platform was flooded with memes comparing GPT-5 to repackaged stuff. One viral post joked: “GPT-5 is like paying for an iPhone 15 but getting an iPhone 13 with a new case.” While anecdotal, the meme captured the overall sentiment that users felt OpenAI had oversold the upgrade.
Other Platforms
On YouTube and LinkedIn, reactions were more mixed. Some tech reviewers acknowledged incremental improvements in reasoning and speed, but admitted that everyday users might not notice much difference. Many echoed the belief that GPT-5 was an “evolution” rather than a true “revolution.”
Is AI in a Bubble?
Despite his ambitious roadmap, Altman admitted that AI is riding a wave of investor hype.
“Are we in a phase where investors as a whole are overexcited about AI? My opinion is yes,” he said. “Is AI the most important thing to happen in a very long time? My opinion is also yes.”
In other words, AI may be overvalued in the short term, but in the long run, Altman believes it will reshape industries, economies, and possibly the internet itself.
Lessons Learned from the ChatGPT-5 Launch
Be Transparent With Users
Hype can create excitement, but if the product doesn’t match the promise, disappointment spreads even faster. By overselling features, OpenAI unintentionally set itself up for criticism. Being honest about what an update can and cannot do helps build long-term trust.
Celebrate Small Wins Honestly
Not every version has to be a groundbreaking leap. Sometimes stability, reliability, and small improvements matter more to users than flashy promises. If framed honestly, even incremental upgrades can feel valuable.
Understand the Spotlight Effect
In the fast-moving AI world, every misstep is amplified. Competitors are quick to point out flaws, and the market responds almost instantly. This means companies like OpenAI need to be cautious about how they communicate new launches.
What Does This Mean for the Future of AI Tools?
While GPT-5’s launch was messy, the bigger story is Altman’s vision for where OpenAI is headed.
- Trillions in Infrastructure: Altman predicted OpenAI will need to spend trillions of dollars on data centers to support billions of daily ChatGPT users.
- Hardware Is the Bottleneck: More advanced models already exist inside OpenAI, but can’t be deployed at scale because of GPU shortages.
- Beyond Chatbots: OpenAI is exploring brain-computer interfaces, a possible Chrome acquisition if regulators force Google to divest, and even AI-driven social networks.
Conclusion
The launch of GPT-5 shows that in AI, trust matters as much as technology. Yes, the model has made improvements. But by overselling it as a big breakthrough and not handling the launch well, OpenAI upset many of the users who made ChatGPT popular in the first place.
As the AI race gets tougher, it won’t just be about who builds the smartest models. The real winners will be the companies that set the right expectations, earn user trust, and try to maintain the human connection alive.
FAQs
Why was ChatGPT-5 so hyped before its launch?
ChatGPT-5 was marketed as “smarter, faster, and more human-like” than previous versions, with promises of advanced reasoning, real-time multimodality, and near-human context understanding.
How is ChatGPT-5 different from GPT-4 or GPT-4o?
While ChatGPT-5 improved slightly in reasoning, memory, and personalization, many users reported it wasn’t a huge leap over GPT-4o.
Is GPT-5 still useful for businesses despite the backlash?
Yes, Businesses can benefit from GPT-5’s stronger coding accuracy, memory features, and slightly faster responses.
Original Article
(Disclaimer – This post is auto-fetched from publicly available RSS feeds. Original source: Startuptalky. All rights belong to the respective publisher.)
